Blog

Baba Siddique, a prominent politician and former Maharashtra minister, was tragically murdered in Mumbai on Saturday evening. This incident has sent shockwaves across the state and the nation, sparking intense investigations and a search for the truth behind his killing. While authorities are diligently working to apprehend the culprits and uncover the motive behind the murder, the circumstances surrounding the incident have raised many questions, especially regarding the involvement of a notorious criminal gang and the alleged connection to a contract killing.

The Murder and the Accused

The brutal murder of Baba Siddique took place outside the office of his MLA son, Zeeshan Siddique, in Bandra East. Three individuals, allegedly members of the notorious Lawrence Bishnoi gang, were involved in the crime. Two suspects, Karnail Singh from Haryana and Dharamraj Kashyap from Uttar Pradesh, have been arrested and are currently being questioned by the Mumbai police.

The Lawrence Bishnoi Gang

The involvement of the Lawrence Bishnoi gang, known for its criminal activities and involvement in high-profile cases, adds a layer of complexity to the investigation. The gang, led by Lawrence Bishnoi, is currently facing numerous charges, including murder, extortion, and drug trafficking. Bishnoi, who is incarcerated, is known to operate his criminal network from behind bars, raising concerns about potential connections to the recent murder. The arrest of the two accused and their alleged affiliation with the gang point to a well-organized operation involving extensive planning and resources.

The Mother’s Statement

The mother of Dharamraj Kashyap, one of the accused, claims that her son was working in a scrapyard in Pune and was unaware of his activities in Mumbai. Her statement raises doubts about the involvement of her son in the crime, however, the police are continuing their investigations to confirm the truth. The conflicting statements of the mother and the alleged affiliation with the Bishnoi gang point towards potential discrepancies in the investigation and highlight the complexities surrounding the case.

The Investigation: A Contract Killing?

Police investigations suggest that the attackers had been meticulously planning Baba Siddique’s murder for over two months. They are probing the possibility of a ‘contract killing,’ where the perpetrators were allegedly paid a substantial sum to carry out the crime. Sources claim that the accused were provided with weapons via prepaid courier just days before the attack and were paid Rs 50,000 for their participation.

Tracking Siddique’s Movement

Police believe a fourth person, who has not been apprehended, may have been involved in the murder by providing information about Siddique’s movements to the attackers. This alleged ‘inside’ support suggests that the perpetrators were well-informed and prepared to carry out their deadly plan with precision. The details concerning the weapon procurement, payment, and alleged involvement of a fourth individual indicate that the murder was a meticulously orchestrated operation.

Baba Siddique’s Political Career and Recent Threats

Baba Siddique was a prominent figure in Maharashtra politics, known for his long association with the Congress party before his recent switch to the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP). He had gained significant influence and recognition within the state’s political landscape. This political affiliation and his high-profile status make him a potential target for those with motives ranging from political vendetta to personal grudges.

The Security Breach

Despite receiving a death threat 15 days prior to the attack, Baba Siddique was under ‘Y’ category security. This raises serious concerns about the effectiveness of security protocols and raises questions regarding potential lapses in protecting him from harm. It remains to be seen how this security breach occurred and whether it played a role in the execution of the murder.

The Importance of a Thorough Investigation

The investigation into the murder of Baba Siddique is complex and multi-faceted. It involves unraveling the motives behind the crime, identifying the mastermind, and securing all the perpetrators. With potential involvement of a notorious criminal gang, alleged contract killing motives, and a high-profile political victim, the police are facing a substantial challenge in ensuring justice and securing the safety of other prominent individuals who may be at risk.

Take Away Points

• The murder of Baba Siddique is a complex and tragic incident, requiring a comprehensive investigation to uncover the truth.
• The involvement of the Lawrence Bishnoi gang adds a layer of complexity to the investigation, suggesting organized crime could be a significant factor.
• The possibility of a contract killing motivates emphasizes the importance of examining the financial aspects of the murder and identifying any potential connections to those with a motive.
• The police’s focus on tracking the movements of the accused and finding the mastermind behind the crime is crucial to bringing the perpetrators to justice and preventing future incidents.
• The investigation into this case highlights the ongoing threat of organized crime and the importance of ensuring the safety and security of high-profile individuals in a society.

Climate activist Sonam Wangchuk has been leading an indefinite hunger strike in Delhi since October 6th, demanding the inclusion of Ladakh in the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution. This demand has sparked controversy and protests, leading to the detention of several of his supporters by the Delhi Police. This action has ignited further concerns about the limits of freedom of assembly in India, with Wangchuk himself questioning the permanent enforcement of Section 163 of the BNSS in Delhi.

The Demand for Sixth Schedule Inclusion

The Leh Apex Body and the Kargil Democratic Alliance have been advocating for Ladakh’s inclusion in the Sixth Schedule for the past four years. Their demand stems from a desire to protect the unique cultural identity and autonomy of the region. The Sixth Schedule provides special administrative provisions for tribal areas in the Northeast, granting autonomous councils significant power in governance.

Benefits of Sixth Schedule Inclusion:

• Preservation of Culture: The Sixth Schedule would offer safeguards for Ladakh’s distinct cultural identity, including language, traditions, and indigenous rights.
• Economic Autonomy: The Sixth Schedule empowers local councils to manage natural resources, potentially leading to greater economic development and benefits for the local population.
• Political Representation: The framework allows for a more direct form of political representation for Ladakhis, ensuring their concerns are addressed effectively.
• Resource Management: The Schedule allows for more efficient and localized resource management, ensuring sustainable development and environmental protection.

The Activist’s Hunger Strike and Detention

Sonam Wangchuk, a renowned climate activist, has taken a bold stand by launching a hunger strike in Delhi to garner attention for Ladakh’s inclusion in the Sixth Schedule. His peaceful protest has resulted in a tense stand-off with authorities, leading to the detention of several of his supporters.

The Detainees:

• Supporters of Wangchuk’s cause were detained from outside the Ladakh Bhawan in Delhi, where Wangchuk is staging his hunger strike.
• Section 163 of the BNSS: This provision, which prohibits unauthorized gatherings, was cited as the justification for the detentions.
• Freedom of Assembly Concerns: Wangchuk’s criticism of the permanent enforcement of Section 163 highlights the growing concerns about the shrinking space for peaceful dissent in India.
• Protesters’ Demands: The detainees were advocating for Ladakh’s inclusion in the Sixth Schedule and demanding a meeting with top officials, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

Legal Implications and Concerns

The Delhi Police’s actions in detaining protesters, including Wangchuk’s supporters, have raised serious concerns about the government’s approach to dissent. The permanent enforcement of Section 163 in New Delhi has been met with criticism, questioning whether the government is curtailing fundamental rights.

Criticisms of Section 163:

• Restriction on Freedom of Assembly: The application of Section 163 in Delhi raises questions about whether the government is employing it as a tool to stifle peaceful protest.
• Unjust and Discriminatory: Some argue that the blanket application of this section, without a clear threat to law and order, can be seen as unjust and discriminatory.
• Transparency and Due Process: Concerns remain regarding the clarity and fairness of the application of this section, particularly when peaceful protests are being targeted.

Sixth Schedule: A Potential Solution or Further Divisions?

The demand for Ladakh’s inclusion in the Sixth Schedule presents both opportunities and challenges. While supporters envision it as a solution for protecting the region’s culture and autonomy, critics argue it could further divide the country.

Arguments for Inclusion:

• Preserves Cultural Identity: Inclusion would recognize the unique culture and heritage of Ladakh and protect its identity within India.
• Promotes Autonomy: The framework empowers local populations to manage their resources and governance, promoting self-reliance and development.
• Empowers Indigenous Rights: It offers a mechanism for the protection of indigenous rights, including language and cultural practices.

Arguments Against Inclusion:

• Divisions and Segregation: Inclusion could further fragment the country by granting special privileges to specific regions.
• Unnecessary Complexity: The already complex structure of India’s political landscape could be made even more intricate.
• Funding and Resource Allocation: Inclusion might create tensions over resource allocation, favoring specific regions.

Take Away Points:

• The demand for Ladakh’s inclusion in the Sixth Schedule has ignited a debate over the best approach to protecting cultural identity and promoting regional autonomy in India.
• The peaceful protests by Wangchuk and his supporters have highlighted the importance of respecting the right to dissent and peaceful assembly.
• The use of Section 163 of the BNSS raises serious concerns about the government’s approach to peaceful protests and the protection of fundamental rights.
• The discussion around Ladakh’s inclusion in the Sixth Schedule requires careful consideration of the potential benefits and drawbacks, ensuring a balanced and equitable approach to address the concerns of all stakeholders.

The tragic shooting of former Maharashtra minister Baba Siddique in Mumbai has sent shockwaves throughout the state and sparked a massive investigation into the motives and connections behind the crime. Two individuals, Gurmail Baljit Singh and an unnamed Uttar Pradesh native, have been arrested and are facing charges of murder. The investigation, currently being conducted by the Mumbai Crime Branch, is focused on uncovering the truth behind the assassination and determining whether any international links, political rivalries, or other underlying factors played a role in Siddique’s death.

Remand and Juvenile Status Determination

The first key development in the case is the remand of Gurmail Baljit Singh, the 23-year-old suspect, to police custody until October 21. This decision, made by the court, allows authorities to continue their investigations and gather crucial evidence. However, the case of the second accused, who claims to be a minor, remains under scrutiny. The court has ordered a bone ossification test to definitively determine his age. The results of this test will determine whether he faces prosecution in juvenile court or the regular legal system.

Significance of Bone Ossification Test

This test is crucial in determining the legal proceedings against the minor suspect. If he is found to be over 18, he will be tried in a regular court alongside the other accused. However, if the test indicates he is a minor, his case will be handled by a juvenile court. This differentiation is critical because juvenile court proceedings and potential penalties differ significantly from those in the adult court system.

Investigation into Motives and Connections

The prosecution, seeking a 14-day remand for both accused, argues that a thorough investigation is necessary to determine the true motives behind the assassination. The prosecutor highlights that Siddique was not an ordinary citizen; he was a former minister with a high-profile background. The ease with which the assailants carried out the attack, despite security, suggests a pre-planned operation and a degree of planning and coordination.

Key Areas of Inquiry

The investigation is focusing on a number of key areas:

• International Link: The possibility of international involvement is being explored to uncover any potential foreign influence or connections related to the assassination. This could involve looking into whether any foreign nationals were involved in the planning, execution, or financial support of the crime.
• Political Rivalries: The prosecutor has specifically mentioned exploring the role of political rivalries in the murder. The investigators will be examining Siddique’s political career, his recent affiliations with the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP), and any potential enemies he might have made during his political journey.
• Personal Motives: While focusing on political motivations, the investigation must also explore any potential personal reasons for the assassination. This could involve examining Siddique’s business interests, his social circles, and any personal conflicts or disputes that might have contributed to the crime.
• Organization and Execution: The investigation is focusing on how the crime was planned and executed. This includes identifying the individual members involved, the logistical support behind the assassination, and any potential coordination between individuals or groups.

Defense Argument: False Implication

The defense attorney, Sidharth Agarwal, acknowledges the tragedy of Siddique’s death but argues that his clients have been falsely implicated. He contends that while political rivalry could be a possible motive for the murder, his clients were not involved and are victims of mistaken identity or deliberate framing.

Legal Strategy: Challenging the Evidence

The defense strategy likely focuses on challenging the evidence presented by the prosecution and highlighting the lack of concrete proof linking the accused to the assassination. The defense might employ a number of tactics:

• Alibis and Witnesses: The defense team will attempt to establish credible alibis for both accused during the time of the shooting. This could involve producing witnesses who can corroborate their claims of being elsewhere during the attack.
• DNA and Forensic Evidence: The defense will likely examine any forensic evidence collected at the crime scene, specifically focusing on whether DNA evidence found at the scene definitively connects the accused to the attack.
• Investigative Methods and Testimony: The defense might challenge the methods used during the investigation, highlighting potential flaws in the collection of evidence or suggesting undue pressure exerted on witnesses.

Conclusion

The investigation into Baba Siddique’s murder remains a high-priority case for Mumbai authorities. The evidence gathered, the testimonies secured, and the legal strategies employed by both the prosecution and defense will shape the course of the trial. Ultimately, the goal of the legal process is to uncover the truth behind this assassination, hold those responsible accountable, and bring a sense of justice to Siddique’s family and the community.

Take Away Points:

• The investigation is looking into the possibility of political motives, international connections, and personal conflicts as possible triggers for the assassination.
• The court ordered a bone ossification test for the second accused, potentially altering his trial proceedings if he is determined to be a minor.
• The prosecution seeks to connect the accused to the crime and uncover the network involved in planning and execution.
• The defense emphasizes the innocence of its clients and alleges they are falsely implicated in the murder.
• This case will have significant implications for Mumbai’s political scene, revealing potential vulnerabilities and highlighting the importance of security for prominent figures.